[PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: Fix two buggy list traversals

[Calvin Owens]

Both of these list traversals use list_for_each_entry_safe(), yet drop
the lock protecting the list during the traversal.

Because the _safe() iterator stores a pointer to the next list node
locally so the current node can be deleted, dropping the lock this way
means the next "cached" list_head might be freed by another caller,
leading the iterator to dereference pointers in freed memory after
reacquiring the lock.

Fix by moving to-be-deleted objects to an on-stack list before actually
deleting them, so the lock can be held for the entire traversal.

This is a bit ugly, because mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry() will still
take the rx_reorder_tbl_lock to delete the item from the two on-stack
lists introduced in this patch. But that is just ugly, not wrong, and
the function has other callers... making the locking conditional seems
strictly uglier.

I discovered this bug while studying the new "nxpwifi" driver, which was
sent to the mailing list about a month ago:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240621075208.513497-1-yu-hao.lin@xxxxxxx/

...but it turns out the new 11n_rxreorder.c in nxpwifi is essentially
exactly identical to mwifiex, save for s/mwifiex/nxpwifi/, so I wanted
to pass along a bugfix for the original driver as well.

I only have an IW612, so this patch was only tested on "nxpwifi".

Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 .../wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c  | 26 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c
index 10690e82358b..fbaecfd32429 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c
@@ -249,20 +249,20 @@ mwifiex_11n_get_rx_reorder_tbl(struct mwifiex_private *priv, int tid, u8 *ta)
 void mwifiex_11n_del_rx_reorder_tbl_by_ta(struct mwifiex_private *priv, u8 *ta)
 {
 	struct mwifiex_rx_reorder_tbl *tbl, *tmp;
+	LIST_HEAD(tmplist);
 
 	if (!ta)
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(tbl, tmp, &priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list) {
-		if (!memcmp(tbl->ta, ta, ETH_ALEN)) {
-			spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
-			mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, tbl);
-			spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
-		}
-	}
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(tbl, tmp, &priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list)
+		if (!memcmp(tbl->ta, ta, ETH_ALEN))
+			list_move_tail(&tbl->list, &tmplist);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
 
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(tbl, tmp, &tmplist, list)
+		mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, tbl);
+
 	return;
 }
 
@@ -785,17 +785,15 @@ void mwifiex_11n_ba_stream_timeout(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
 void mwifiex_11n_cleanup_reorder_tbl(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
 {
 	struct mwifiex_rx_reorder_tbl *del_tbl_ptr, *tmp_node;
+	LIST_HEAD(tmplist);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(del_tbl_ptr, tmp_node,
-				 &priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list) {
-		spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
-		mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, del_tbl_ptr);
-		spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
-	}
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr);
+	list_splice_tail_init(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, &tmplist);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
 
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(del_tbl_ptr, tmp_node, &tmplist, list)
+		mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, del_tbl_ptr);
+
 	mwifiex_reset_11n_rx_seq_num(priv);
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2