Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 7/30/24 08:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.3 release.
> There are 809 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:14:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.3-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

perf failed to build with the following error:

In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:
tests/pmu.c: In function 'test__name_len':
tests/pmu.c:400:25: error: too few arguments to function 
'pmu_name_len_no_suffix'
  TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cpu", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("cpu") == strlen("cpu"));
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tests/tests.h:15:8: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL'
  if (!(cond)) {        \
        ^~~~
In file included from util/evsel.h:13,
                 from util/evlist.h:14,
                 from tests/pmu.c:2:
util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here
 int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:

this is caused by 958e16410f96ee72efc7a93e5d1774e8a236f2f5 ("perf tests: 
Add some pmu core functionality tests")
--
Florian