Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] firmware: support i.MX95 SCMI BBM/MISC Extenstion

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Wed Jul 31 2024 - 09:00:00 EST


On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 08:56:04PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> i.MX95 System Manager Firmware source: https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-sm
> To generate html from the repo: make html
>
> i.MX95 System Manager Firmware support vendor extension protocol:
> - Battery Backed Module(BBM) Protocol
> This protocol is intended provide access to the battery-backed module.
> This contains persistent storage (GPR), an RTC, and the ON/OFF button.
> The protocol can also provide access to similar functions implemented via
> external board components. The BBM protocol provides functions to:
>
> - Describe the protocol version.
> - Discover implementation attributes.
> - Read/write GPR
> - Discover the RTCs available in the system.
> - Read/write the RTC time in seconds and ticks
> - Set an alarm (per LM) in seconds
> - Get notifications on RTC update, alarm, or rollover.
> - Get notification on ON/OFF button activity.
>
> - MISC Protocol for misc settings
> This includes controls that are misc settings/actions that must be
> exposed from the SM to agents. They are device specific and are usually
> define to access bit fields in various mix block control modules,
> IOMUX_GPR, and other GPR/CSR owned by the SM.
> This protocol supports the following functions:
>
> - Describe the protocol version.
> - Discover implementation attributes.
> - Set/Get a control.
> - Initiate an action on a control.
> - Obtain platform (i.e. SM) build information.
> - Obtain ROM passover data.
> - Read boot/shutdown/reset information for the LM or the system.
>
> This patchset is to support the two protocols and users that use the
> protocols. The upper protocol infomation is also included in patch 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> Changes in v7:
> - Just correct R-b tag from Rob to drop quotes "", and rebased
> - Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240718-imx95-bbm-misc-v2-v6-0-18f008e16e9d@xxxxxxx

I specifically asked you to avoid re-spinning just for this reason within
20 mins from your response, yet you managed to churn it within that time 🙁.
I must respond at flash speed to avoid such things in the future 😢.

--
Regards,
Sudeep