Re: [PATCH] usb: storage: ene_ub6250: Fix right shift warnings

[Alan Stern]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 11:15:28AM +0200, 'Oliver Neukum' via USB Mass Storage on Linux wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 30.07.24 19:56, Abhishek Tamboli wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 09:09:05AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> > > 1. use a constant, where a constant is used
> > I think you are suggesting that I should replace hard-coded values like the
> > buffer size with named constants. For example:
> > 
> > #define BUF_SIZE 8
> > unsigned char buf[BUF_SIZE];
> 
> Yes, but the constant we need to look at here is bl_len.
> This is a variable needlessly.

The code in ms_scsi_read_capacity() is written that way to be consistent 
with the sd_scsi_read_capacity() routine.  Or maybe it was just 
copied-and-pasted, and then the variable's type was changed for no good 
reason.

Replacing the variable with a constant won't make much difference.  The 
compiler will realize that bl_len has a constant value and will generate 
appropriate code anyway.  I think just changing the type is a fine fix.

> > > 2. use the macros for converting endianness
> > Can I use macros like cpu_to_le32 for converting the bl_num and bl_len values.
> > Should I replace all instances of manual bitwise shifts with these macros?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > For example:
> > 
> >      u32 bl_len = 0x200;
> >      buf[0] = cpu_to_le32(bl_num) >> 24;
> >      buf[4] = cpu_to_le32(bl_len) >> 24;
> > 
> > Is using cpu_to_le32 appropriate for the data format required by this
> > device?
> 
> Well, the format is big endian. So, cpu_to_be32() will be required.

Better yet, use put_unaligned_be32().  However, there's nothing really 
wrong with the code as it stands.  It doesn't need to be changed now.

Alan Stern