Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf bpf: Move BPF disassembly routines to separate file to avoid clash with capstone bpf headers

[Ian Rogers]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 10:08 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 8:12 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> > +perf-util-y += disasm_bpf.o
>
> I think this can be gated by LIBBFD and LIBBPF config, but not sure
> it can express the both requirements easily.

Should we gate things on libbfd? Given we can't distribute a binary
linked against it, I support deleting all libbfd support. Fixes like
this show the pain in carrying it.

Thanks,
Ian