Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix outdated comment about incomplete FGT bitmask definitions

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 19:58:37 +0100,
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Comments in the code say that our definitions for the FGT registers are not
> the generated ones and are updated only as far as DDI0487 J.a however in
> commit 9ff67dd26a9e ("KVM: arm64: Use generated FGT RES0 bits instead of
> specifying them") we updated to use the generated definitions, and as of
> the release of DDI0487 K.a the XML in DD0601 is in sync with the ARM.

s/ARM/ARM ARM/. Which revision of the XML? K.a and the latest version
of the XML are definitely not in sync.

Also, please make use of punctuation. I can't parse this *single*
sentence as it stands.

> Remove the outdated comment about divergence.
>
> Fixes: 9ff67dd26a9e ("KVM: arm64: Use generated FGT RES0 bits instead of specifying them")

Definitely *not* a fix.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.