[PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca807x: Drop unnecessary and broken DT validation

From: Rob Herring (Arm)
Date: Wed Jul 31 2024 - 16:18:33 EST


The check for "leds" and "gpio-controller" both being present is never
true because "leds" is a node, not a property. This could be fixed
with a check for child node, but there's really no need for the kernel
to validate a DT. Just continue ignoring the LEDs if GPIOs are present.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c b/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c
index 672c6929119a..ba558486c72f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c
@@ -733,16 +733,6 @@ static int qca807x_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
"qcom,dac-disable-bias-current-tweak");

#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
- /* Make sure we don't have mixed leds node and gpio-controller
- * to prevent registering leds and having gpio-controller usage
- * conflicting with them.
- */
- if (of_find_property(node, "leds", NULL) &&
- of_find_property(node, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
- phydev_err(phydev, "Invalid property detected. LEDs and gpio-controller are mutually exclusive.");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* Do not register a GPIO controller unless flagged for it */
if (of_property_read_bool(node, "gpio-controller")) {
ret = qca807x_gpio(phydev);
--
2.43.0