Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Do jump_label_init before early_security_init

[Paul Moore]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:34 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> LSM indirect calls being are now replaced by static calls, this requires
> a jumpt_table_init before early_security_init where LSM hooks and their
> static calls and keys are initialized.
>
> Fixes: 2732ad5ecd5b ("lsm: replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls")
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  init/main.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Does this look okay, static call folks?

> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 206acdde51f5..5bd45af7a49e 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,8 @@ void start_kernel(void)
>         boot_cpu_init();
>         page_address_init();
>         pr_notice("%s", linux_banner);
> +       /* LSM and command line parameters use static keys */
> +       jump_label_init();
>         early_security_init();
>         setup_arch(&command_line);
>         setup_boot_config();
> @@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ void start_kernel(void)
>         boot_cpu_hotplug_init();
>
>         pr_notice("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
> -       /* parameters may set static keys */
> -       jump_label_init();
>         parse_early_param();
>         after_dashes = parse_args("Booting kernel",
>                                   static_command_line, __start___param,
> --
> 2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog

-- 
paul-moore.com