Re: [linus:master] [mm] c0bff412e6: stress-ng.clone.ops_per_sec -2.9% regression

[David Hildenbrand]

On 01.08.24 09:44, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 8/1/2024 2:49 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > We now have to do a page_folio(page) and then test for hugetlb.
> >
> >       return folio_test_hugetlb(page_folio(page));
> >
> > Nowadays, folio_test_hugetlb() will be faster than at c0bff412e6 times,
> > so maybe at least part of the overhead is gone.
> This is great. We will check the trend to know whether it's recovered
> in some level.

Oh, I think d99e3140a4d33e26066183ff727d8f02f56bec64 went upstream 
before c0bff412e67b781d761e330ff9578aa9ed2be79e, so at the time of 
c0bff412e6 we already should have had the faster check!

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb