Re: syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least

From: Andreas Schwab
Date: Thu Aug 01 2024 - 07:48:00 EST

Next message: Hongzhen Luo: "[PATCH] erofs: simplify readdir operation"
Previous message: Yue Haibing: "[PATCH -next] regulator: max77857: Make max77857_id static"
In reply to: Florian Weimer: "syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least"
Next in thread: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Aug 01 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:

> It's been repported that __NR_newfstatat has gone missing from the UAPI
> headers.

It has actually been wrongly renamed to __NR_fstatat.

--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."

Next message: Hongzhen Luo: "[PATCH] erofs: simplify readdir operation"
Previous message: Yue Haibing: "[PATCH -next] regulator: max77857: Make max77857_id static"
In reply to: Florian Weimer: "syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least"
Next in thread: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]