Re: [PATCH 09/12] selftests/nolibc: add support for LLVM= parameter
From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Sat Aug 03 2024 - 05:45:44 EST
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:10:03PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Makefile.include can modify CC and CFLAGS for usage with clang.
> Make use of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> index 8000bc3c408b..cdff317c35f2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c89 -W -Wall -Wex
> $(CFLAGS_$(XARCH)) $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR) $(CFLAGS_EXTRA)
> LDFLAGS :=
>
> +# Modify CFLAGS based on LLVM=
> +include $(srctree)/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
I'm confused, doesn't it precisely undo the previous patch, which
said that we ought not to include Makefile.include as it makes it
harder for LLVM ?
If so, I suspect that both commits should be squashed with a better
explanation for both operations at once (e.g. maybe "move makefile
inclusion later to benefit from LLVM=..." etc).
Thanks,
Willy