Re: [PATCH] exec: drop a racy path_noexec check

[Kees Cook]

On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> But having it in there isn't wrong. In procfs permission/eligibility
> checks often are checked as close to the open as possible. Worst case
> it's something similar here. But it's certainly wrong to splat about it.

Right, please keep the redundant check, but we can downgrade it from a
WARN. It's caught stuff in the past, so I'd like to retain it until we
really do feel safe enough to let it go.

-- 
Kees Cook