Re: [PATCH] mm: attempt to batch free swap entries for zap_pte_range()
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Aug 06 2024 - 18:41:19 EST
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 04:44:44 +0800 Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > +static bool try_batch_swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *p,
> >
> > Why call it "p" here and not "si" like in the other code you are touching?
>
> that is because I found other _free_ functions are all using "p":
`p' sucks. "pointer to something". It's just lazy. In this context, "si"
has meaning; lots of it.