[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
On Wed 07 Aug 2024 at 07:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/08/2024 03:55, Xianwei Zhao wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your review.
On 2024/8/6 21:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]Yes. The previous submission was lost.
On 06/08/2024 12:27, Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Add C3 PLL controller input clock parameters "fix".
What is "parameters" here? Why you are adding it? Is it missing?
Something is not working?
What submission is lost?
He means it was just forgotten in the submission and noboby picked up on
it at the time. He is not not trying to sneak anything new. That input
is used everywhere in the driver and nothing would work without it.
It is just an honest mistake that he is trying to correct
Indeed the description could certainly detail this a bit more
Fixes: 0e6be855a96d ("dt-bindings: clock: add Amlogic C3 PLL clock controller")
Why? What bug are you fixing?
The input clock of PLL clock controller need the clock whose fw_name is
called "fix".
Then explain this in commit msg.
This is "fixed" clock.
Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,c3-pll-clkc.yaml | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,c3-pll-clkc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,c3-pll-clkc.yaml
index 43de3c6fc1cf..700865cc9792 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,c3-pll-clkc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/amlogic,c3-pll-clkc.yaml
@@ -24,11 +24,13 @@ properties:
items:
- description: input top pll
- description: input mclk pll
+ - description: input fix pll
clock-names:
items:
- const: top
- const: mclk
+ - const: fix
and that's not an ABI break because?
I will modify "fix" to "fixed",in next version.
No keep the original name. No reason to change it and make more of a mess.
With "fixed" it is still ABI break, right?
It is an ABI break but on a new and immature platform.
Noboby could really use that platform at this stage, so nothing is going
to break on anyone really.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
Jerome