Re: [PATCH 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 07/31, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Andrii Nakryiko (6):
>   uprobes: revamp uprobe refcounting and lifetime management
>   uprobes: protected uprobe lifetime with SRCU
>   uprobes: get rid of enum uprobe_filter_ctx in uprobe filter callbacks
>   uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU
>     protection
>   uprobes: perform lockless SRCU-protected uprobes_tree lookup
>   uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance
>
> Peter Zijlstra (2):
>   rbtree: provide rb_find_rcu() / rb_find_add_rcu()
>   perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister()

I see nothing wrong in 1-7. LGTM.

But since you are going to send the new version, I'd like to apply V2
and then try to re-check the resulting code.

As for 8/8 - I leave it to you and Peter. I'd prefer SRCU though ;)

Oleg.