Re: [PATCH] softirq: Do not loop if running under a real-time task

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2024-07-25 08:44:02 [+0000], Petr Malat wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Petr,

> what is the status of this softirq issue? By looking on the current
> upstream code, I think the problem is still there. I can resend my
> patch or rework it to use independent task struct flag to decide if
> softirq processing should be skipped in the current thread.

I was re-reading the thread. I don't see how the migration thread should
run softirqs. This should not happen or please show how if so.

Your example has a long running timer callback which probably gets
PI-boosted by a threaded-IRQ. The longterm plan is that long running
timer callbacks don't affect threaded interrupts as they do now.
The worked started with
	c5bcab7558220 ("locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure.")
	https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/c5bcab7558220

and needs to continue.

> BR,
>   Petr

Sebastian