Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code

[KP Singh]

On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 10:45 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:41 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:20 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > For what it's worth, I have not noticed any issues in my -next testing
> > > with this patch applied but I only build architectures that build with
> > > LLVM due to the nature of my work. If exposure to more architectures is
> > > desirable, perhaps Guenter Roeck would not mind testing it with his
> > > matrix?
> >
> > Thanks Nathan.
> >
> > I think the additional testing would be great, KP can you please work
> > with Guenter to set this up?
>

Adding Guenter directly to this thread.

> Is that something you can do KP?  I'm asking because I'm looking at
> merging some other patches into lsm/dev and I need to make a decision
> about the static call patches (hold off on merging the other patches
> until the static call testing is complete, or yank the static call
> patches until testing is complete and then re-merge).  Understanding
> your ability to do the additional testing, and a rough idea of how

I have done the best of the testing I could do here. I think we should
let this run its normal course and see if this breaks anything. I am
not sure how testing is done before patches are merged and what else
you expect me to do?


> long it is going to take would be helpful here.
>
> --
> paul-moore.com