Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2024-07-05 14:49:13 [+0200], To linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,

> this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock
> unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it
> disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic
> section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed
> that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT.
> 
> v2…v3 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240620153556.777272-1-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>   - Do "size_t index" within the for loop.

Can this be applied, please? Or v2 ;)

Sebastian