Re: [PATCH v4 06/22] mm/zsmalloc: convert create_page_chain() and its users to use zpdesc

[Alex Shi]

On 8/9/24 2:25 AM, Vishal Moola wrote:
>>> I'm not a fan of the names above. IMO, naming should follow some
>>> semblance of consistency regarding their purpose (or have comments
>>> that describe their purpose instead).
>>>
>>> At a glance zpdesc_set_zspage() and zpdesc_set_first() sound like they
>>> are doing similar things, but I don't think they serve similar purposes?
>> zpdesc_set_zspage() only used in one place, a helper maynot needed. Let me remove it.
>> Same thing for the alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc(), they could be merge into using place.
> alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc() are fine as is. The helper functions
> will be useful whenever memdescs can be allocated on their own, so its
> better to introduce it now.

Thanks for suggestion. will recover them in next version, maybe tomorrow if no more comments.