Well this is implementation detail later in the series and I found it better to focus ACPI ID discussion in 1/6.I was thinking these quirks can be passed as driver_data more cleanly
and be specific only to affected HW if AMD HW would have an unique
ACPI ID for each HW version.
Above X86_VENDOR_AMD might be too generic if and when quirks are fixed
in the future HW :-)
So something like:
static const struct acpi_device_id i3c_hci_acpi_match[] = {
{"AMDI1234", HCI_QUIRK_PIO_MODE | HCI_QUIRK_OD_PP_TIMING |
HCI_QUIRK_RESP_BUF_THLD},
{}
};
and set them in the i3c_hci_probe() as:
hci->quirks = (unsigned long)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
Nice idea. But only problem is that MSFT wants to have the same ACPI
ID present in the specification.
I have replied to Andy on patch 1/6. Can you please put your remarks
there?
Yeah, agreed that having X86_VENDOR_AMD is too generic, but felt itsquirks, reduced quirks or new quirks and X86_VENDOR_AMD test will work only with the first case :-)
good to have additional checks only after the HW is fixed, rather than
being speculative now.. :-)
What would you advise?
Most probably there will be future HW with either exactly same set of