Re: [PATCH v2] Do not mark ACPI devices as irq safe

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Breno,

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:47:54AM GMT, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:53:17PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > You don't need to resend the patch. Because the changes are only
> > in the commit log, I can take care of them.
> 
> In fact, the changes are in the code itself, see the changelog:
> 
>   * Replaced ACPI_HANDLE() by has_acpi_companion() (Andy Shevchenko)
>   * Expanded the comment before the change (Andy Shevchenko)

I meant no need to send a v3.

> > Besides, you also need:
> > 
> > Fixes: ede2299f7101 ("i2c: tegra: Support atomic transfers")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.6+
> > 
> > Can you please check whether this is right?
> 
> I would say that we probably want to blame the support for ACPI device,
> which came later than ede2299f7101 ("i2c: tegra: Support atomic
> transfers").
> 
> I'd suggest the following:
> 
>  Fixes: bd2fdedbf2ba ("i2c: tegra: Add the ACPI support")
>  CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.17+

Makes sense.

> I am not planning to submit a new patch with these changes, please let
> me know if you need action on my side.

Not for now, you might need to still support the backports to
stable as there might be some differences and I can already see
that it doesn't apply that far back (from 6.1, basically).

Andi

> Thanks for handling this fix,
> --breno