Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Match Stall behaviour for S2
From: Jason Gunthorpe
Date: Wed Aug 14 2024 - 11:52:10 EST
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 02:56:33PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Also described in the pseudocode “SteIllegal()”
> if eff_idr0_stall_model == '10' && STE.S2S == '0' then
> // stall_model forcing stall, but S2S == 0
> return TRUE;
This clips out an important bit:
if STE.Config == '11x' then
[..]
if eff_idr0_stall_model == '10' && STE.S2S == '0' then
// stall_model forcing stall, but S2S == 0
return TRUE;
And here we are using STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS which is 101 and won't
match the STE.Config qualification.
The plain text language said the S2S is only required if the S2 is
translating, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS puts it in bypass.
> + /*
> + * S2S is ignored if stage-2 exists but not enabled.
> + * S2S is not compatible with ATS.
> + */
> + if (master->stall_enabled && !ats_enabled &&
> + smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S2)
> + target->data[2] |= STRTAB_STE_2_S2S;
We can't ignore ATS if it was requested here.
I think that does point to an issue, ATS should be fixed up here:
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2492,6 +2492,9 @@ static bool arm_smmu_ats_supported(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
if (!(fwspec->flags & IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_ATS))
return false;
+ if (master->stall_enabled)
+ return false;
+
return dev_is_pci(dev) && pci_ats_supported(to_pci_dev(dev));
}
And your hunk above should be placed in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste()
not arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste()
Not ignoring the event still makes sense to me, but I didn't check it
carefully. We can decode the S2 event right?
Jason