Re: [PATCH v5 04/26] rust: alloc: implement `Allocator` for `Kmalloc`

[Danilo Krummrich]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:28:10PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> On 14.08.24 17:19, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 05:03:21PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:00 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If we keep them, we'd consequently also need to add them for vrealloc() and
> >>> kvrealloc(). But again, they don't do anything for us, and hence are more
> >>> misleading than helpful IMO.
> >>
> >> In general, they could do something (e.g. `noreturn`), perhaps in the future.
> > 
> > Indeed, and I think once they're honored we should add them again.
> 
> That sounds like it will be a lot of work, going through every function
> and checking if it has the given attribute. Especially when the
> attributes are enabled one by one. I think we should keep them (and of
> course introduce them on new functions).

I don't think it's gonna be a lot of work, if they're honored one day, which we
don't know, do we?

Since it seems that everyone else prefers to have those attributes, I'll keep /
add them accordingly.

However, I think we should at least keep a comment in rust/helpers.c that
documents which attributes are honored by bindgen and which aren't. For now,
the comment should probably say that non of them are honored?

> 
> ---
> Cheers,
> Benno
> 
> > It's just that I think as long as compiler attributes aren't honored, we should
> > not have them in the first place to avoid confusion about whether they do or do
> > not have any effect.
>