Re: [PATCH 00/24] Complete EEVDF

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 18:59 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 18:46, Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 16:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > >
> > > While trying to test what would be the impact of delayed dequeue on
> > > load_avg, I noticed something strange with the running slice. I have a
> > > simple test with 2 always running threads on 1 CPU and the each thread
> > > runs around 100ms continuously before switching to the other one
> > > whereas I was expecting 3ms (the sysctl_sched_base_slice on my system)
> > > between 2 context swicthes
> > >
> > > I'm using your sched/core branch. Is it the correct one ?
> >
> > Hm, building that branch, I see the expected tick granularity (4ms).
>
> On my side tip/sched/core switches every 4ms but Peter's sched/core,
> which is delayed queued on top of tip/sched/core if I don't get it
> wrong, switches every 100ms.

FWIW, I checked my local master-rt tree as well, which has Peter's
latest eevdf series wedged in (plus 4cc290c20a98 now).. it also worked
as expected.

	-Mike