Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: Add arch hooks for enabling/disabling virtualization

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Wed Aug 14 2024 - 14:15:54 EST


On 6/8/24 02:06, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Add arch hooks that are invoked when KVM enables/disable virtualization.
x86 will use the hooks to register an "emergency disable" callback, which
is essentially an x86-specific shutdown notifier that is used when the
kernel is doing an emergency reboot/shutdown/kexec.

Add comments for the declarations to help arch code understand exactly
when the callbacks are invoked. Alternatively, the APIs themselves could
communicate most of the same info, but kvm_arch_pre_enable_virtualization()
and kvm_arch_post_disable_virtualization() are a bit cumbersome, and make
it a bit less obvious that they are intended to be implemented as a pair.

Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 96ad3e8b9ddb..12ef3beb4e47 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1514,6 +1514,20 @@ static inline void kvm_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_HARDWARE_ENABLING
+/*
+ * kvm_arch_{enable,disable}_virtualization() are called on one CPU, under
+ * kvm_usage_lock, immediately after/before 0=>1 and 1=>0 transitions of
+ * kvm_usage_count, i.e. at the beginning of the generic hardware enabling
+ * sequence, and at the end of the generic hardware disabling sequence.
+ */
+void kvm_arch_enable_virtualization(void);
+void kvm_arch_disable_virtualization(void);
+/*
+ * kvm_arch_hardware_{enable,disable}() are called on "every" CPU to do the
+ * actual twiddling of hardware bits. The hooks are called all online CPUs
+ * when KVM enables/disabled virtualization. Enabling/disabling is also done
+ * when a CPU is onlined/offlined (or Resumed/Suspended).
+ */
int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void);
void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void);

Since you are at it, rename these to kvm_arch_{enable,disable}_virtualization_cpu()?

Paolo

#endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 7bdd744e4821..e20189a89a64 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -5505,6 +5505,16 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, hardware_enabled);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(kvm_usage_lock);
static int kvm_usage_count;
+__weak void kvm_arch_enable_virtualization(void)
+{
+
+}
+
+__weak void kvm_arch_disable_virtualization(void)
+{
+
+}
+
static int __kvm_enable_virtualization(void)
{
if (__this_cpu_read(hardware_enabled))
@@ -5604,6 +5614,8 @@ static int kvm_enable_virtualization(void)
if (kvm_usage_count++)
return 0;
+ kvm_arch_enable_virtualization();
+
r = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_KVM_ONLINE, "kvm/cpu:online",
kvm_online_cpu, kvm_offline_cpu);
if (r)
@@ -5634,6 +5646,7 @@ static int kvm_enable_virtualization(void)
unregister_syscore_ops(&kvm_syscore_ops);
cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_AP_KVM_ONLINE);
err_cpuhp:
+ kvm_arch_disable_virtualization();
--kvm_usage_count;
return r;
}
@@ -5647,6 +5660,7 @@ static void kvm_disable_virtualization(void)
unregister_syscore_ops(&kvm_syscore_ops);
cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_AP_KVM_ONLINE);
+ kvm_arch_disable_virtualization();
}
static int kvm_init_virtualization(void)