Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: supply: sc27xx-fg: add low voltage alarm IRQ
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Fri Aug 16 2024 - 12:04:48 EST
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> > > The SC27XX fuel gauge supports a low voltage alarm IRQ, which is used
> > > for more accurate battery capacity measurements with lower voltages.
> > >
> > > This was unfortunately never documented in bindings, do so now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Initial Linux driver submission adding this feature:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ee1dd39f126bd03fb88381de9663d32df994d341.1542185618.git.baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > The only in-tree user (sc2731.dtsi) has had interrupts specified since its
> > > initial fuel-gauge submission:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4f66af3b47ba241380f8092e08879aca6d7c35b3.1548052878.git.baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > This context could go into the commit message I think, as justification
> > for making the interrupt required.
>
> TBH I'm not 100% sure that the interrupt is required, I just looked at
> the Linux driver, and that it returns from probe if it doesn't get the IRQ.
>
> >
> > Also, this binding is odd in that it has several compatibles in an enum,
> > but the driver (added at the same time) only has one compatible in it.
>
> I think the intent was to document the entire sc27xx series of PMICs, as
> they're supposedly very similar (this is just my guess), while initially
> adding support only for sc2731.
>
> > Are you using the sc2731 in your device?
>
> No, I do not have any such device.
No worries.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature