[PATCH v13 01/20] tracing: fgraph: Fix to add new fgraph_ops to array after ftrace_startup_subops()

[Masami Hiramatsu (Google)]

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

Since the register_ftrace_graph() assigns a new fgraph_ops to
fgraph_array before registring it by ftrace_startup_subops(), the new
fgraph_ops can be used in function_graph_enter().

In most cases, it is still OK because those fgraph_ops's hashtable is
already initialized by ftrace_set_filter*() etc.

But if a user registers a new fgraph_ops which does not initialize the
hash list, ftrace_ops_test() in function_graph_enter() causes a NULL
pointer dereference BUG because fgraph_ops->ops.func_hash is NULL.

This can be reproduced by the below commands because function profiler's
fgraph_ops does not initialize the hash list;

 # cd /sys/kernel/tracing
 # echo function_graph > current_tracer
 # echo 1 > function_profile_enabled

To fix this problem, add a new fgraph_ops to fgraph_array after
ftrace_startup_subops(). Thus, until the new fgraph_ops is initialized,
we will see fgraph_stub on the corresponding fgraph_array entry.

Fixes: c132be2c4fcc ("function_graph: Have the instances use their own ftrace_ops for filtering")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/fgraph.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
index d1d5ea2d0a1b..d7d4fb403f6f 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
@@ -1206,18 +1206,24 @@ static void init_task_vars(int idx)
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 }
 
-static void ftrace_graph_enable_direct(bool enable_branch)
+static void ftrace_graph_enable_direct(bool enable_branch, struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 {
 	trace_func_graph_ent_t func = NULL;
 	trace_func_graph_ret_t retfunc = NULL;
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_set_bit(i, &fgraph_array_bitmask,
-			 sizeof(fgraph_array_bitmask) * BITS_PER_BYTE) {
-		func = fgraph_array[i]->entryfunc;
-		retfunc = fgraph_array[i]->retfunc;
-		fgraph_direct_gops = fgraph_array[i];
-	 }
+	if (gops) {
+		func = gops->entryfunc;
+		retfunc = gops->retfunc;
+		fgraph_direct_gops = gops;
+	} else {
+		for_each_set_bit(i, &fgraph_array_bitmask,
+				 sizeof(fgraph_array_bitmask) * BITS_PER_BYTE) {
+			func = fgraph_array[i]->entryfunc;
+			retfunc = fgraph_array[i]->retfunc;
+			fgraph_direct_gops = fgraph_array[i];
+		}
+	}
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!func))
 		return;
 
@@ -1256,8 +1262,6 @@ int register_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 		ret = -ENOSPC;
 		goto out;
 	}
-
-	fgraph_array[i] = gops;
 	gops->idx = i;
 
 	ftrace_graph_active++;
@@ -1266,7 +1270,7 @@ int register_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 		ftrace_graph_disable_direct(true);
 
 	if (ftrace_graph_active == 1) {
-		ftrace_graph_enable_direct(false);
+		ftrace_graph_enable_direct(false, gops);
 		register_pm_notifier(&ftrace_suspend_notifier);
 		ret = start_graph_tracing();
 		if (ret)
@@ -1281,14 +1285,15 @@ int register_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 	} else {
 		init_task_vars(gops->idx);
 	}
-
 	/* Always save the function, and reset at unregistering */
 	gops->saved_func = gops->entryfunc;
 
 	ret = ftrace_startup_subops(&graph_ops, &gops->ops, command);
+	if (!ret)
+		fgraph_array[i] = gops;
+
 error:
 	if (ret) {
-		fgraph_array[i] = &fgraph_stub;
 		ftrace_graph_active--;
 		gops->saved_func = NULL;
 		fgraph_lru_release_index(i);
@@ -1324,7 +1329,7 @@ void unregister_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *gops)
 	ftrace_shutdown_subops(&graph_ops, &gops->ops, command);
 
 	if (ftrace_graph_active == 1)
-		ftrace_graph_enable_direct(true);
+		ftrace_graph_enable_direct(true, NULL);
 	else if (!ftrace_graph_active)
 		ftrace_graph_disable_direct(false);