[syzbot] [ocfs2?] possible deadlock in ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Aug 19 2024 - 03:43:29 EST

Next message: Michael Walle: "Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] drm/mediatek: Add support for OF graphs"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [ext4?] KASAN: use-after-free Read in ext4_search_dir (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 670c12ce09a8 Merge tag 'for-6.11/dm-fixes' of git://git.ke..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14c78c5b980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=7229118d88b4a71b
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d516fba7bc3c966c9a9
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=125d01d5980000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=15be6bf3980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-670c12ce.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fdc54e331300/vmlinux-670c12ce.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e69f58032670/bzImage-670c12ce.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/52ffc309994f/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+5d516fba7bc3c966c9a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal
ocfs2: Mounting device (7,0) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00221-g670c12ce09a8 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor327/5097 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880127b5f40 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
ffff8880127b5f40 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x192/0x4eb0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:786

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880119131b8 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_xattr_set+0x633/0x1930 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3584

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #5 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
ocfs2_init_acl+0x397/0x930 fs/ocfs2/acl.c:366
ocfs2_mknod+0x1c05/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:408
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3578 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline]
path_openat+0x1a9a/0x3470 fs/namei.c:3883
do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3913
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1416
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1442
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #4 (jbd2_handle){.+.+}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
start_this_handle+0x1eb4/0x2110 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:448
jbd2__journal_start+0x2da/0x5d0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:505
jbd2_journal_start+0x29/0x40 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:544
ocfs2_start_trans+0x3c9/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:352
ocfs2_mknod+0x150c/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:359
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3578 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline]
path_openat+0x1a9a/0x3470 fs/namei.c:3883
do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3913
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1416
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1442
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #3 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
ocfs2_start_trans+0x3be/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:350
ocfs2_mknod+0x150c/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:359
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3578 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline]
path_openat+0x1a9a/0x3470 fs/namei.c:3883
do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3913
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1416
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1442
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1675 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1858 [inline]
ocfs2_start_trans+0x2b9/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:348
ocfs2_mknod+0x150c/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:359
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3578 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline]
path_openat+0x1a9a/0x3470 fs/namei.c:3883
do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3913
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1416
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1442
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#4){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits+0x132/0x2870 fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c:636
ocfs2_reserve_clusters_with_limit+0x1b8/0xb60 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1166
ocfs2_mknod+0x1486/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:352
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3578 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline]
path_openat+0x1a9a/0x3470 fs/namei.c:3883
do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3913
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1416
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1442
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x192/0x4eb0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:786
ocfs2_reserve_new_metadata_blocks+0x41c/0x9c0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:982
ocfs2_init_xattr_set_ctxt+0x3a6/0x900 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3278
ocfs2_xattr_set+0xf4e/0x1930 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3635
__vfs_setxattr+0x468/0x4a0 fs/xattr.c:200
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x12e/0x660 fs/xattr.c:234
vfs_setxattr+0x221/0x430 fs/xattr.c:321
do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:629 [inline]
path_setxattr+0x37e/0x4d0 fs/xattr.c:658
__do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:676 [inline]
__se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:672 [inline]
__x64_sys_setxattr+0xbb/0xd0 fs/xattr.c:672
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#3 --> jbd2_handle --> &oi->ip_xattr_sem

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);
lock(jbd2_handle);
lock(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);
lock(&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#3);

*** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor327/5097:
#0: ffff8880380d6420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515
#1: ffff888011913480 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
#1: ffff888011913480 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x1e1/0x430 fs/xattr.c:320
#2: ffff8880119131b8 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_xattr_set+0x633/0x1930 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3584

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5097 Comm: syz-executor327 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00221-g670c12ce09a8 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x192/0x4eb0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:786
ocfs2_reserve_new_metadata_blocks+0x41c/0x9c0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:982
ocfs2_init_xattr_set_ctxt+0x3a6/0x900 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3278
ocfs2_xattr_set+0xf4e/0x1930 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3635
__vfs_setxattr+0x468/0x4a0 fs/xattr.c:200
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x12e/0x660 fs/xattr.c:234
vfs_setxattr+0x221/0x430 fs/xattr.c:321
do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:629 [inline]
path_setxattr+0x37e/0x4d0 fs/xattr.c:658
__do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:676 [inline]
__se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:672 [inline]
__x64_sys_setxattr+0xbb/0xd0 fs/xattr.c:672
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7eff22d82ed9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff9ba303c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0030656c69662f2e RCX: 00007eff22d82ed9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000300 RDI: 00000000200002c0
RBP: 00007eff22dcc095 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000555556a234c0
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff9ba303f0
R13: 00007fff9ba30618 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007eff22dcc03b
</TASK>
OCFS2: ERROR (device loop0): int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(struct ocfs2_alloc_context *, handle_t *, u32, u32, struct ocfs2_suballoc_result *): Chain allocator dinode 23 has 4294967295 used bits but only 16777215 total
On-disk corruption discovered. Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the filesystem is unmounted.
OCFS2: File system is now read-only.
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits:2038 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):__ocfs2_claim_clusters:2412 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):__ocfs2_claim_clusters:2420 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_block_group_alloc_contig:437 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_block_group_alloc:709 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_block_group_alloc:762 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits:837 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits:854 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_reserve_new_metadata_blocks:994 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_reserve_new_metadata_blocks:1017 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_init_xattr_set_ctxt:3281 ERROR: status = -30
(syz-executor327,5097,0):ocfs2_xattr_set:3638 ERROR: status = -30

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: Michael Walle: "Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] drm/mediatek: Add support for OF graphs"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [ext4?] KASAN: use-after-free Read in ext4_search_dir (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]