Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the R9A08G045 support
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue Aug 20 2024 - 12:45:15 EST
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:45:43AM +0300, claudiu beznea wrote:
>
>
> On 19.08.2024 19:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:22:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 19/08/2024 13:10, claudiu beznea wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 19.08.2024 14:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:23:44PM +0300, Claudiu wrote:
> >>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Document the Renesas RZ/G3S (R9A08G045) RIIC IP. This is compatible with
> >>>>> the version available on Renesas RZ/V2H (R9A09G075).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes in v4:
> >>>>> - added comment near the fallback for RZ/G3S; because of this
> >>>>> dropped Conor's tag
> >>>>
> >>>> That's not a reason to request a re-review.
> >
> > FWIW, I don't care about how many binding patches I do or do not get
> > credit for reviewing.
>
> I had no intention to drop your credit for reviewing this. In the past I
That comment was meant for Krzysztof, so that he wouldn't feel like he
should avoid acking so that I could re-ack in similar situations in the
future.
> went though situations where reviewer complained due to keeping the tag and
> doing very simple adjustment on the next version. I dropped your tag to
> avoid that situation here too and mentioned it in the change log.
Ye, I did note that you'd not dropped it confusingly :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature