Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: eud: Update compatible strings for eud

[Melody Olvera]

On 8/14/2024 3:09 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> On 8/14/2024 1:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, no. We considered several options, but none guarantee that we will avoid
> > > a crash if we try non-securely. The secure call also won't give a specific error if it fails either
> > > (for security reasons) so we can't know if a secure access failed because it's supposed to be
> > > accessed non-securely or for another reason; hence this approach. If there's
> > > another way to achieve this functionality that might be better, I'm all ears.
> > Can we read some fuse values and decide based on that?
> In most of the cases, these fuse values are not allowed to be read
> from the Linux, so that will be another problem. Melody can check
> if there is any fuse values around here and possible to read them
> through Linux.

I double-checked, but there really isn't any kind of fuse or anything we 
can read to determine
how we need to access these registers. I remembered checking before 
authoring these patches,
but I wanted to just make sure before responding here.

Thanks,
Melody