On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:27 AM lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Can we modify it for tt.c?
I beg to differ:
在 2024/8/19 23:58, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx><snip>
Since thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip() and thermal_unbind_cdev_from_trip()
acquire the thermal zone lock, the locking rules for their callers get
complicated. In particular, the thermal zone lock cannot be acquired
in any code path leading to one of these functions even though it might
be useful to do so.
To address this, remove the thermal zone locking from both these
functions, add lockdep assertions for the thermal zone lock to both
of them and make their callers acquire the thermal zone lock instead.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v2 -> v3: Rebase after dropping patches [04-05/17] from the series
v1 -> v2: No changes
---
drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 2 +-
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
@@ -785,6 +785,7 @@ int thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip(struct the
int result;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.cIf so, it seems that the for_each_thermal_trip() can be removed or no
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_bind_unbind_cdev
.thermal = thermal, .cdev = cdev, .bind = bind
};
- return for_each_thermal_trip(thermal, bind_unbind_cdev_cb, &bd);
+ return thermal_zone_for_each_trip(thermal, bind_unbind_cdev_cb, &bd);
need to export.
$ git grep for_each_thermal_trip | head -1
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tt.c:
for_each_thermal_trip(mvm->tz_device.tzone, iwl_trip_temp_cb, &twd);
.