Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] thermal: core: Rearrange checks in thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 1:11 PM lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2024/8/21 17:28, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
> > On 21/08/2024 10:49, lihuisong (C) wrote:
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >>> -    list_for_each_entry(pos2, &thermal_cdev_list, node) {
> >>> -        if (pos2 == cdev)
> >>> -            break;
> >>> -    }
> >>> +    lockdep_assert_held(&thermal_list_lock);
> >>> -    if (tz != pos1 || cdev != pos2)
> >>> +    if (list_empty(&tz->node) || list_empty(&cdev->node))
> >> The old verification is ensure that tz and cdev already add to
> >> thermal_tz_list and thermal_cdev_list，respectively.
> >> Namely, tz and cdev are definitely registered and intialized.
> >> The check is ok for all untizalized thermal_zone_device and cooling
> >> device.
> >> But the new verification doesn't seem to do that.
> >
> > If the tz or the cdev are registered then their "->node" is not empty
> > because they are linked with the thermal_list and cdev_list
> >
> > So either way is browsing the lists to find the tz/cdev or just check
> > "->node" is not empty. The latter the faster.
> Assume that tz/cdev isn't intiazlized and registered to thermal_tz_list
> or thermal_cdev_list. And then directly call this interface.

Who does this?