Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE
From: Darrick J. Wong
Date: Wed Aug 21 2024 - 13:11:56 EST
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:48:00AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> For when an inode is enabled for atomic writes, set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE
> flag. Only direct IO is currently supported, so check for that also.
>
> We rely on the block layer to reject atomic writes which exceed the bdev
> request_queue limits, so don't bother checking any such thing here.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 9b6530a4eb4a..3489d478809e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1149,6 +1149,18 @@ xfs_file_remap_range(
> return remapped > 0 ? remapped : ret;
> }
>
> +static bool xfs_file_open_can_atomicwrite(
> + struct inode *inode,
> + struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
> +
> + if (!(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT))
> + return false;
> +
> + return xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(ip);
...and here too. I do like the shift to having an incore flag that
controls whether you get untorn write support or not.
--D
> +}
> +
> STATIC int
> xfs_file_open(
> struct inode *inode,
> @@ -1157,6 +1169,8 @@ xfs_file_open(
> if (xfs_is_shutdown(XFS_M(inode->i_sb)))
> return -EIO;
> file->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
> + if (xfs_file_open_can_atomicwrite(inode, file))
> + file->f_mode |= FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE;
> return generic_file_open(inode, file);
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>