Re: [PATCH 1/1] remoteproc: Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc()
From: Mathieu Poirier
Date: Thu Aug 22 2024 - 12:18:35 EST
Hi Baolu,
Sorry for the late reply, this slipped through the cracks.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:28:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> An iommu domain is allocated in rproc_enable_iommu() and is attached to
> rproc->dev.parent in the same function.
>
> Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc() to make it explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610085555.88197-13-baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index f276956f2c5c..eb66f78ec8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -109,10 +109,10 @@ static int rproc_enable_iommu(struct rproc *rproc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> - if (!domain) {
> + domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
I'm a little hesitant here. Function iommu_domain_alloc() passes NULL two the
second argument of __iommu_domain_alloc() while iommu_paging_domain_alloc()
provides a 'dev'. I don't have any HW to test on and I am not familiar enough
with the IOMMU subsystem to confidently more forward.
I am asking the Qualcomm (Bjorn and friends) and TI crew (Beleswar, Andrew,
Nishanth and Hari) to test this patch on their IOMMU devices and get back to me
with a "Tested-by".
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + if (IS_ERR(domain)) {
> dev_err(dev, "can't alloc iommu domain\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return PTR_ERR(domain);
> }
>
> iommu_set_fault_handler(domain, rproc_iommu_fault, rproc);
> --
> 2.34.1
>