[PATCH net-next] idpf: Slightly simplify memory management in idpf_add_del_mac_filters()
From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Fri Aug 23 2024 - 02:23:52 EST
In idpf_add_del_mac_filters(), filters are chunked up into multiple
messages to avoid sending a control queue message buffer that is too large.
Each chunk has up to IDPF_NUM_FILTERS_PER_MSG entries. So except for the
last iteration which can be smaller, space for exactly
IDPF_NUM_FILTERS_PER_MSG entries is allocated.
There is no need to free and reallocate a smaller array just for the last
iteration.
This slightly simplifies the code and avoid an (unlikely) memory allocation
failure.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
index 70986e12da28..b6f4b58e1094 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
@@ -3669,12 +3669,15 @@ int idpf_add_del_mac_filters(struct idpf_vport *vport,
entries_size = sizeof(struct virtchnl2_mac_addr) * num_entries;
buf_size = struct_size(ma_list, mac_addr_list, num_entries);
- if (!ma_list || num_entries != IDPF_NUM_FILTERS_PER_MSG) {
- kfree(ma_list);
+ if (!ma_list) {
ma_list = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!ma_list)
return -ENOMEM;
} else {
+ /* ma_list was allocated in the first iteration
+ * so IDPF_NUM_FILTERS_PER_MSG entries are
+ * available
+ */
memset(ma_list, 0, buf_size);
}
--
2.46.0