Re: [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: fix some spelling errors in comments

[Jeff Layton]

On Fri, 2024-08-23 at 15:00 +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
> Fix spelling errors in comments of nfsd4_release_lockowner and
> nfs4_set_delegation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index a20c2c9d7d45..66a0c76850f3 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -5856,7 +5856,7 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Now that the deleg is set, check again to ensure that nothing
> -	 * raced in and changed the mode while we weren't lookng.
> +	 * raced in and changed the mode while we weren't looking.
>  	 */
>  	status = nfsd4_verify_setuid_write(open, fp->fi_deleg_file);
>  	if (status)
> @@ -8335,7 +8335,7 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
>   * @cstate: NFSv4 COMPOUND state
>   * @u: RELEASE_LOCKOWNER arguments
>   *
> - * Check if theree are any locks still held and if not - free the lockowner
> + * Check if there are any locks still held and if not - free the lockowner

This is probably better grammatically:

    Check if there are any locks still held and if not, free the lockowner

>   * and any lock state that is owned.
>   *
>   * Return values:

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>