[PATCH v3] x86/aperfmperf: Use time_after() for jiffies comparison

[Chen Yufan]

Use time_after() instead of using
jiffies directly to handle wraparound.

Signed-off-by: Chen Yufan <chenyufan@xxxxxxxx>
---
The modifications made compared to the previous version are as follows:
1. Remove extra '+' in the header.
2. Change the subject and description for clarity.
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
index 0b69bfbf345d..2772cc166b1b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
 
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
@@ -434,7 +435,7 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
 	 * Bail on invalid count and when the last update was too long ago,
 	 * which covers idle and NOHZ full CPUs.
 	 */
-	if (!mcnt || (jiffies - last) > MAX_SAMPLE_AGE)
+	if (!mcnt || time_after(jiffies, last + MAX_SAMPLE_AGE))
 		goto fallback;
 
 	return div64_u64((cpu_khz * acnt), mcnt);
-- 
2.39.0