Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: drop PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> There is no existing user of the flag and the flag is dangerous because
> a nested allocation context can use GFP_NOFAIL which could cause
> unexpected failure. Such a code would be hard to maintain because it
> could be deeper in the call chain.
> 
> PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM has been added even when it was pointed out [1]
> that such a allocation contex is inherently unsafe if the context
> doesn't fully control all allocations called from this context.

Wouldn't a straight-up revert of eab0af905bfc be cleaner?  Or is there
a reason to keep PF_MEMALLOC_NOWARN?