Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: soc: ti: Add AM65 peripheral virtualization unit

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 27/08/2024 11:29, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    minItems: 2
>>
>> maxItems instead.
> 
> Can change, but maybe use the chance to explain to me why "maxItems" and
> why also "instead".

because minItems is not constrained. maxItem is and, in case of lack of
minItems, it implies minItems.

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +  reg-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: cfg
>>> +      - const: tlbif
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: fault interrupt
>>> +
>>> +  interrupt-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: pvu
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - interrupts
>>> +  - interrupt-names
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    ti-pvu@30f80000 {
>>
>> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
>> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>
>> for sure "ti" is not generic. pvu is the device name.
> 
> No problem - which one do you propose for this type of device?

iommu, but if this is not suitable, at pvu could stay. Just the first
'ti-' does not sound right in that case.

Best regards,
Krzysztof