Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] printk: Add print format (%par) for struct range

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2024-08-26 16:17:52, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> But I could live with all other variants, except for %pn mentioned below.

I believe %r is also no go as we most likely get a complier warning.

...

> > Am I missing your point somehow?  I considered cramming a struct range into a
> > struct resource to let resource_string() process the data.  But that would
> > involve creating a new IORESOURCE_* flag (not ideal) and also does not allow
> > for the larger u64 data in struct range should this be a 32 bit physical
> > address config.
> 
> This would be nasty. I believe that this is not what Andy meant.

You are right, this is not what I meant.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko