Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-x1e80100: Don't use parking clk_ops for QUPs

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Aug 27 2024 - 14:16:26 EST


Quoting Stephen Boyd (2024-08-27 11:02:48)
> Quoting Bryan O'Donoghue (2024-08-23 05:58:56)
> > Per Stephen Boyd's explanation in the link below, QUP RCG clocks do not
> > need to be parked when switching frequency. A side-effect in parking to a
> > lower frequency can be a momentary invalid clock driven on an in-use serial
> > peripheral.
> >
> > This can cause "junk" to spewed out of a UART as a low-impact example. On
> > the x1e80100-crd this serial port junk can be observed on linux-next.
> >
> > Apply a similar fix to the x1e80100 Global Clock controller to remediate.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819233628.2074654-3-swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Fixes: 161b7c401f4b ("clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for X1E80100")
> > Fixes: 929c75d57566 ("clk: qcom: gcc-sm8550: Mark RCGs shared where applicable")
> > Suggested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Applied to clk-fixes
>

Unapplied :( See this email[1] for more info. I'm thinking that this can
be applied to clk-next instead, by qcom maintainers.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAE-0n52rYVs81jtnFHyfc+K4wECvyCKmnHu2w9JhPNqvMYEeOA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx