Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] serial: sc16is7xx: cosmetic cleanup

[Jiri Slaby]

On 27. 08. 24, 17:38, Lech Perczak wrote:
> Only the single expansion of GENMASK proves very hard to analyze in the
> diff - so I double-checked with a calculator,
> though all BIT() expansions do match, as does the updated definition.
> of SC16IS7XX_LSR_BRK_ERROR_MASK.

You can diff also the generated .o fed through objdump -d (generated .s 
usually contains line numbers).

regards,
--
js
suse labs