Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: loongson3: Use raw_smp_processor_id() in do_service_request()

From: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Wed Aug 28 2024 - 07:59:29 EST


On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 14:24 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of plain smp_processor_id() in
> do_service_request(), otherwise we may get some errors with the driver
> enabled:
>
>  BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: (udev-
> worker)/208
>  caller is loongson3_cpufreq_probe+0x5c/0x250 [loongson3_cpufreq]
>
> Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>

After this patch the BUG() message is gone, but I still get

[ 6.610357] loongson3_cpufreq loongson3_cpufreq: probe with driver loongson3_cpufreq failed with error -1

-1 is EPERM and there are several "return -EPERM;" in the code. Not
sure which one.

Do I need to modify some firmware setting to make it work?

FWIW I'm building it as a module. Should I try building it as a part of
vmlinux?

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/loongson3_cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/loongson3_cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/loongson3_cpufreq.c
> index 5f79b6de127c..6b5e6798d9a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/loongson3_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/loongson3_cpufreq.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct loongson3_freq_data
> *, freq_data);
>  static inline int do_service_request(u32 id, u32 info, u32 cmd, u32
> val, u32 extra)
>  {
>   int retries;
> - unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>   unsigned int package = cpu_data[cpu].package;
>   union smc_message msg, last;
>  

--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University