Re: [PATCH] irq_work: Avoid unnecessary "IRQ work" interrupts

[bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On 2024-08-28 13:26:42 [+0000], Brandt, Oliver - Lenze wrote:
> 
> Hmm.... I see. What about calling wake_irq_workd() directly; something
> like
> 
>         if (rt_lazy_work)
>                 wake_irq_workd();
>         else if (!lazy_work || tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
>                 irq_work_raise(work);

this might work but I'm not too sure about it. This will become a
problem if irq_work_queue() is invoked from a path where scheduling is
not possible due to recursion or acquired locks. 

How much of a problem is it and how much you gain by doing so?

> Regards,
> Oliver

Sebastian