Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/321] 6.1.107-rc1 review

From: Shreeya Patel
Date: Thu Aug 29 2024 - 08:07:44 EST


---- On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 20:05:08 +0530 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote ---
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.107 release.
> There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:37:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.107-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>

Hi,

Please find the KernelCI report below :-


OVERVIEW

Builds: 25 passed, 2 failed

Boot tests: 412 passed, 0 failed

CI systems: broonie, maestro

REVISION

Commit
name: v6.1.106-322-gb9218327d235
hash: b9218327d235d21e2e82c8dc6a8ef4a389c9c6a6
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y


BUILDS

Failures
-i386 (tinyconfig)
Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:66cdf1fffb8042744d0f1923
Build error: kernel/rcu/rcu.h:218:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmem_dump_obj’; did you mean ‘mem_dump_obj’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
-x86_64 (tinyconfig)
Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:66cdf200fb8042744d0f192a
Build error: kernel/rcu/rcu.h:218:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmem_dump_obj’; did you mean ‘mem_dump_obj’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
CI system: maestro


BOOT TESTS

No new boot failures found

See complete and up-to-date report at:

https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=b9218327d235d21e2e82c8dc6a8ef4a389c9c6a6&var-patchset_hash=


Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
KernelCI team