Re: [PATCH 02/25] KVM: TDX: Define TDX architectural definitions

[Edgecombe, Rick P]

On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 21:25 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 8/13/2024 6:47 AM, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * TD_PARAMS is provided as an input to TDH_MNG_INIT, the size of which is
> > 1024B.
> > + */
> > +struct td_params {
> > +       u64 attributes;
> > +       u64 xfam;
> > +       u16 max_vcpus;
> > +       u8 reserved0[6];
> > +
> > +       u64 eptp_controls;
> > +       u64 exec_controls;
> 
> TDX 1.5 renames 'exec_controls' to 'config_flags', maybe we need update 
> it to match TDX 1.5 since the minimum supported TDX module of linux 
> starts from 1.5.

Agreed.

> 
> Besides, TDX 1.5 defines more fields that was reserved in TDX 1.0, but 
> most of them are not used by current TDX enabling patches. If we update 
> TD_PARAMS to match with TDX 1.5, should we add them as well?

You mean config_flags or supported "features0"? For config_flags, it seems just
one is missing. I don't think we need to add it.

> 
> This leads to another topic that defining all the TDX structure in this 
> patch seems unfriendly for review. It seems better to put the 
> introduction of definition and its user in a single patch.

Yea.