Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Improve crash_kexec_post_notifiers description

[Guilherme G. Piccoli]

On 30/08/2024 14:15, Stephen Brennan wrote:
> [...]
> 
> This is definitely clearer and an improvement! But I didn't (and still
> don't) love the phrase "users who doubt kdump will succeed" because I
> think that implies user error or silly beliefs.
> 
> What if these two sentences read something like:
> 
> In configurations where kdump may not be reliable, running the panic
> notifiers can allow collecting more data on dmesg, like stack traces
> from other CPUS or extra data dumped by panic_print.
> 
>> Notice that some code
>> +			enables this option unconditionally, like Hyper-V,
>> +			PowerPC (fadump) and AMD SEV.
> 
> Yes, great addition.
> 
> With or without my suggestions it's an improvement, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks Stephen, I agree - your wording sounds better.
I've incorporated that in the just sent V2.
Cheers,


Guilherme


P.S. I'll be OOO some days, so expect a bit of delay in case there are
more reviews/interactions.