Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Red-black tree abstraction needed by Rust Binder

From: Miguel Ojeda
Date: Sat Aug 31 2024 - 11:39:23 EST

Next message: Rich Felker: "Re: [musl] AT_MINSIGSTKSZ mismatched interpretation kernel vs libc"
Previous message: claudiu beznea: "Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device"
In reply to: David Rheinsberg: "Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Red-black tree abstraction needed by Rust Binder"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 6:38 PM Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patchset contains the red-black tree abstractions needed by the Rust
> implementation of the Binder driver.

Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!

[ Updated link to docs.kernel.org. - Miguel ]

Cheers,
Miguel

Next message: Rich Felker: "Re: [musl] AT_MINSIGSTKSZ mismatched interpretation kernel vs libc"
Previous message: claudiu beznea: "Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device"
In reply to: David Rheinsberg: "Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Red-black tree abstraction needed by Rust Binder"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]