Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] arch: vDSO: Add a __vdso_getrandom prototype for all architectures
From: Jason A. Donenfeld
Date: Sun Sep 01 2024 - 09:40:08 EST
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 03:23:39PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 04:44:40PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Ruoyao,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 2:13 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Without a prototype, we'll have to add a prototype for each architecture
> > > implementing vDSO getrandom. As most architectures will likely have the
> > > vDSO getrandom implemented in a near future, and we'd like to keep the
> > > declarations compatible everywhere (to ease the Glibc work), we should
> > > really just have one copy of the prototype.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/entry/vdso/vgetrandom.c | 2 --
> > > include/vdso/getrandom.h | 5 +++++
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vgetrandom.c b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vgetrandom.c
> > > index 52d3c7faae2e..430862b8977c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vgetrandom.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vgetrandom.c
> > > @@ -6,8 +6,6 @@
> > >
> > > #include "../../../../lib/vdso/getrandom.c"
> > >
> > > -ssize_t __vdso_getrandom(void *buffer, size_t len, unsigned int flags, void *opaque_state, size_t opaque_len);
> > > -
> > > ssize_t __vdso_getrandom(void *buffer, size_t len, unsigned int flags, void *opaque_state, size_t opaque_len)
> > > {
> > > return __cvdso_getrandom(buffer, len, flags, opaque_state, opaque_len);
> > > diff --git a/include/vdso/getrandom.h b/include/vdso/getrandom.h
> > > index 4cf02e678f5e..08b47b002bf7 100644
> > > --- a/include/vdso/getrandom.h
> > > +++ b/include/vdso/getrandom.h
> > > @@ -56,4 +56,9 @@ struct vgetrandom_state {
> > > */
> > > extern void __arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack(u8 *dst_bytes, const u32 *key, u32 *counter, size_t nblocks);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > Though in this file there are already comments beginning with /**, but
> > it seems the kernel's code style suggests beginning with /*.
>
> /** is for docbook comments.
I'll fix this commit up as follows: