Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the clk tree

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:27 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The following commit is also in the renesas tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
>   042859e80d4b ("dt-bindings: clock: renesas: Document RZ/V2H(P) SoC CPG")
>
> This is commit
>
>   afec1aba0860 ("dt-bindings: clock: renesas: Document RZ/V2H(P) SoC CPG")
>
> in the renesas tree.

Thanks, I am aware of this issue.  Due to an oversight on my side
when queuing the RZ/V2H clock driver one month ago, I forgot to put
the RZ/V2H DT binding definitions on its own branch.  As these binding
definitions are needed for the DTS part, too, I had the choice between
merging in lots of unrelated clock commits, or just duplicating the
aforementioned commit.  Hence I picked the latter.

Sorry for the troubles.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds